The following configurations are available with the coupon
GMKK11W10 (applied at checkout):
- Barebone (0+0): $469.99
- 32GB RAM + 1TB SSD: $589.99
- 32GB RAM + 2TB SSD: $639.99
- 64GB RAM + 1TB SSD: $688.99
SPECS:- Processor: AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS
- Graphics: AMD Radeon 780M
- Memory: 2 x DDR5 5600MHz (Max 96GB)
- Storage: 2 x PCIe 4.0 M.2 2280 SSD
- Wireless: WiFi 6 + Bluetooth 5.2
- Ports:
- 4 × USB-A: 2 × USB 3.2 Gen2 (10Gbps, front) + 2 × USB 2.0 (rear)
- 2 × USB-C: USB4 (40Gbps, PD 3.0, DP 1.4)
- 1 × HDMI: HDMI 2.1
- 1 × DisplayPort: DisplayPort 2.1
- 1 × Audio Jack: 3.5mm (CTIA standard)
- 1 × OCuLink: PCIe Gen4 ×4 (non-hot-swappable)
- Additional Features:
- Quad Display Support (8K@60Hz)
- Dual 2.5GbE LAN for advanced networking
- High-efficiency cooling system
- OCuLink external GPU expansion support
https://www.gmktec.com/products/a...header_1.1
Leave a Comment
9 Comments
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
Our community has rated this post as helpful. If you agree, why not thank ghostfreckle
$475 for K11 (8945HS) WITHOUT ram, ssd, or Windows license.
$520 for K8 Plus, that includes 32gb DDR5 ram, 1tb NVME SSD, and Windows 11 license. (Amazon and GMK website)
You will see zero difference in performance, but probably more heat.
It is 300 mhz less and doesnt have the NPU (16 TOPS is not that fast), but you save $170. It has the all-important oculink port and all of the usual fixins.
Even if you juice up the CPUs to 75 watts, you will never run all of the cores at the 4.9 ghz, let alone 5.2 ghz. It makes a ton more noise for basically nothing (regardless of brand)
I had the M7 and the K8 for a while and had no issues with either. The only benchmark between AOOSTAR and GMKTec showed the GMKTec being faster due to adjustable frame buffer for the shared VRAM, which I can 100% attest is also adjustable (though buried in the BIOS) on the AOOSTAR, up to 16g.
Honestly, if it werent for their anti-oculink position, I would go for Beelink, but given that they are all in on their proprietary dock for their GTi series, I knew that wasnt going to happen.
It is 300 mhz less and doesnt have the NPU (16 TOPS is not that fast), but you save $170. It has the all-important oculink port and all of the usual fixins.
Even if you juice up the CPUs to 75 watts, you will never run all of the cores at the 4.9 ghz, let alone 5.2 ghz. It makes a ton more noise for basically nothing (regardless of brand)
I had the M7 and the K8 for a while and had no issues with either. The only benchmark between AOOSTAR and GMKTec showed the GMKTec being faster due to adjustable frame buffer for the shared VRAM, which I can 100% attest is also adjustable (though buried in the BIOS) on the AOOSTAR, up to 16g.
Honestly, if it werent for their anti-oculink position, I would go for Beelink, but given that they are all in on their proprietary dock for their GTi series, I knew that wasnt going to happen.
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
It is 300 mhz less and doesnt have the NPU (16 TOPS is not that fast), but you save $170. It has the all-important oculink port and all of the usual fixins.
Even if you juice up the CPUs to 75 watts, you will never run all of the cores at the 4.9 ghz, let alone 5.2 ghz. It makes a ton more noise for basically nothing (regardless of brand)
I had the M7 and the K8 for a while and had no issues with either. The only benchmark between AOOSTAR and GMKTec showed the GMKTec being faster due to adjustable frame buffer for the shared VRAM, which I can 100% attest is also adjustable (though buried in the BIOS) on the AOOSTAR, up to 16g.
Honestly, if it werent for their anti-oculink position, I would go for Beelink, but given that they are all in on their proprietary dock for their GTi series, I knew that wasnt going to happen.
link for the aoostar?
check Amazon. my post with the original link was removed, but it's from aoostars direct storefront
Leave a Comment