https://www.bhphotovide
expired Posted by doublehelixx | Staff • Mar 3, 2025
Mar 3, 2025 3:34 PM
Item 1 of 4
Item 1 of 4
expired Posted by doublehelixx | Staff • Mar 3, 2025
Mar 3, 2025 3:34 PM
1TB Crucial P310 2280 PCIe Gen4 3D NAND NVMe M.2 SSD
+ Free Shipping$65
$98
33% offAmazon
Visit AmazonGood Deal
Bad Deal
Save
Share
Leave a Comment
Top Comments
According to https://www.techpowerup
Just look at what's on the NVME PCB.
Outside of the NAND itself and the controller, the rest is very rudimentary. Most of it is components you'll find on every other circuit in existence.
As long as these companies are sourcing reputable NAND and controllers, that should be what matters most.
The only reason you didn't see more brands with mechanical drives is because the assembly of a mechanical drive is way more technical, requiring clean rooms and special gasses. However, the PCBs were often outsourced to the same types of companies now capable of making NVME drives.
37 Comments
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
It's not like failure ratings are anything new. Hard drives advertise their MTBF and hardly anyone in the consumer world paid attention. It's just that this new crop of tech people are overly sensitive about everything (blame YouTube).
As for businesses, yes, the answer is to make regular backups.
That's why most of them are still using mechanical drives and tape.
If you had a petabyte to worry about, you would know this.
Restoring from backups is a worst case nightmare scenario. It is better than going out of business but it is not something to take lightly. That is why you have RAID and also a strategy regarding the brands of the NVME drives you are using. That is also why there are companies that pay ransoms for ransomware even when they have backups. Sometimes it is literally cheaper just to pay the ransom and get back up and running than to restore from backup HDDs.
Drive brand and quality, RAID, and backups are a layered system. Only an ignorant amateur would think those things are interchangeable.
Also if you understood ZFS arrays you would understand why brand of NVME matters way more than brand of HDD.
Frankly I'm sick of people making these idiotic comparisons and analogies with "car warranties" and HDDs. These are all very different things used for different purposes with different failure modes.
Some reading for you "backup" Kang...
Reduce disruption
Regardless of the industry you operate in, ransomware can have a profound impact on your usual daily operations and may result in significant financial losses. Many organizations are willing to pay a relatively small amount of money in order to quickly resolve the issue and get their business back on track.
Can be cheaper
The main cost of ransomware is the associated downtime. In fact, according to Datto, the average cost of downtime is more than 10 times higher than the average requested ransom amount. As such, paying the ransom and quickly decrypting your files can work out to be much cheaper than spending time trying to restore your system from backups.
Insurance may help cover the costs
As mentioned above, there have been some high profile cases of insurance companies not paying out for ransomware incidents. Nevertheless, if you have invested in good cyber liability insurance, there's a good chance that your insurance will help cover at least a portion of the ransom cost.
People who say "just have backups" are ignoramuses who have never worked in IT at scale.
Restoring from backups is a worst case nightmare scenario. It is better than going out of business but it is not something to take lightly. That is why you have RAID and also a strategy regarding the brands of the NVME drives you are using. That is also why there are companies that pay ransoms for ransomware even when they have backups. Sometimes it is literally cheaper just to pay the ransom and get back up and running than to restore from backup HDDs.
Drive brand and quality, RAID, and backups are a layered system. Only an ignorant amateur would think those things are interchangeable.
Also if you understood ZFS arrays you would understand why brand of NVME matters way more than brand of HDD.
Frankly I'm sick of people making these idiotic comparisons and analogies with "car warranties" and HDDs. These are all very different things used for different purposes with different failure modes.
Some reading for you "backup" Kang...
https://www.emsisoft.co
People who say "just have backups" are ignoramuses who have never worked in IT at scale.
You're conflating a lot of different technologies and worst case scenarios in order to... what? Make things sound way more complicated than they need to be?
RAID is not a replacement for backups, for starters. It will not protect you from corrupted data. In fact, it propagates it. It's right in the name.
Likewise, data corruption isn't exclusively a symptom of hardware failure.
A proper backup strategy mitigates issues caused by either and is something every user —business or otherwise— should be doing as a last line of defense.
If you want to be choosy with brands, that's your prerogative. But it has zero bearing on whether or not you should be backing up your data.
As for the rest of your rambling, learn context.
You're conflating a lot of different technologies and worst case scenarios in order to... what? Make things sound way more complicated than they need to be?
RAID is not a replacement for backups, for starters. It will not protect you from corrupted data. In fact, it propagates it. It's right in the name.
Likewise, data corruption isn't exclusively a symptom of hardware failure.
A proper backup strategy mitigates issues caused by either and is something every user —business or otherwise— should be doing as a last line of defense.
If you want to be choosy with brands, that's your prerogative. But it has zero bearing on whether or not you should be backing up your data.
As for the rest of your rambling, learn context.
Dude, backups are a clumsy worst case scenario. The fact you keep hammering them as your first line solution tells me all I need to know.
No sir. Brand of NVME, redundancy (RAID), file system (ZFS), best practices (scrubs), snapshots, ransomware protection (SnapShield), etc should be all in place to minimize the catastrophic need to use "backups."
Dude, backups are a clumsy worst case scenario. The fact you keep hammering them as your first line solution tells me all I need to know.
No sir. Brand of NVME, redundancy (RAID), file system (ZFS), best practices (scrubs), snapshots, ransomware protection (SnapShield), etc should be all in place to minimize the catastrophic need to use "backups."
You're on a thread about a consumer-grade 1TB NVME drive. And it's on sale, to boot.
Like I said previously, everyone should be backing up their data. As long as this is done regularly, it will mitigate most hardware failures, regardless of how they arise.
The fact that you're somehow finding qualms with this statement and attempting to make it overcomplicated might earn you an overinflated budget for your IT department, but it isn't going to work on people who know when to speak layman.
There's way too much conflation and far too much assumption/word insertion to take you seriously, even if what you're saying actually had traction.
It's apparently enough to warrant a $7 price difference.
Buy whichever looks better to you.
Leave a Comment